Treatment of Atlantoaxial Dislocation in Children with Down Syndrome Using Posterior Atlantoaxial Screw Fixation.

Background: To investigate the effect of posterior atlantoaxial screw fixation for the treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation in children with Down syndrome (DS). Methods: Children diagnosed with DS who underwent posterior atlantoaxial screw fixation or occipitocervical fusion from January 2017 to January 2020 in Hebei Children's Hospital were retrospectively included. Preoperative CT and MRI were performed to check the os odontoideum (OsO) and spinal cord compression, signal changes and spinal cord injury grade (ASIA grade). Results: All 5 children have atlantoaxial dislocation and OsO. Among which 60% (3/5) of children had changes in spinal cord signals and 40% (2/5) had dural sac compression. Every child underwent posterior atlantoaxial screw fixation (3.5-mm diameter), and the average fusion level was 1.8 (1-2). All 5 cases wore the head-neck-chest brace for 3-6 months after the operation. 1 case had dural tear and recovered well after timely suturing. 1 case had internal fixation breakage of the prosthetic joint and underwent revision surgery. At the last follow-up, all cases were fused and the neurological function were all ASIA grade E. Conclusion: After posterior atlantoaxial screw fixation, fusion and nerve recovery were achieved in all children with atlantoaxial dislocation and OsO. Postoperative head-neck-chest braces are necessary for children, especially those with occipitocervical fusion.

Epiphyseal enchondroma masking as osteoid osteoma: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Enchondromas originating in the epiphyses of long bones are rare and epiphyseal osteoid osteomas are also uncommon. Diagnosis can become elusive when enchondromas or osteoid osteomas occur in atypical locations and present with nonspecific clinical and imaging characteristics. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of epiphyseal enchondroma of the left proximal femur in a 15-year-old girl with a 2-month history of left lower extremity pain. Preoperative CT displayed thickened cortex in the anterior surface of the left proximal femur with specks of calcification and inhomogeneity of the adjacent bone marrow cavity. She was diagnosed with osteoid osteoma. Postoperative pathological examination of surgically excised specimens revealed a diagnosis of enchondromas. CONCLUSIONS: Our case highlights that enchondroma should be considered in lesions of the epiphysis.

Epidural Injection With or Without Steroid in Managing Chronic Low-Back and Lower Extremity Pain: A Meta-Analysis of 10 Randomized Controlled Trials.

Chronic low-back and lower extremity pain is mainly caused by lumbar disc herniation and radiculitis. Various surgery and nonsurgical modalities, including epidural injections, have been used to treat lumbar disc herniation or radiculitis. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess the effects of the 2 interventions in managing various chronic low and lower extremity pain. A systematic literature search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials, which compared the effect of local anesthetic with or without steroids. The outcomes included pain relief, functional improvement, opioid intake, and therapeutic procedural characteristics. Pooled estimates were calculated using a random-effects or fixed-effects model, depending on the heterogeneity between the included studies. Ten randomized controlled trials (involving 1111 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that 41.7% of patients who received local anesthetic with steroid (group 1) and 40.2% of patients who received local anesthetic alone (group 2) had significant improvement in pain relief, and the Numeric Rating Scale pain scales were significantly reduced by 4.09 scores [95% confidence interval (CI), -4.26 to -3.91] and 4.12 (95% CI, -4.35 to -3.89) scores, respectively. Similarly, 39.8% of patients in group 1 and 40.7% in group 2 achieved significantly improved functional status. The Oswestry Disability Indices in the 2 groups were reduced by 14.5 (95% CI, -15.24 to -13.75) and 12.37 (95% CI, -16.13 to -8.62), respectively. The average procedures per year in group 1 were 3.68 ± 1.17 and 3.68 ± 1.26 in group 2, with an average total relief per year of 31.67 ± 13.17 and 32.64 ± 13.92 weeks, respectively. The opioid intake decreased from baseline by 8.81 mg (95% CI, -12.24 to -5.38) and 16.92 mg (95% CI: -22.71 to -11.12) in the 2 groups, respectively. This meta-analysis confirms that epidural injections of local anesthetic with or without steroids have beneficial but similar effects in the treatment of patients with chronic low-back and lower extremity pain.

Epidural injection with or without steroid in managing chronic low back and lower extremity pain: ameta-analysis of ten randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Chronic low back and lower extremity pain is mainly caused by lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and radiculitis. Various surgery and nonsurgical modalities, including epidural injections, have been used to treat LDH or radiculitis. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess the effects of the two interventions in managing various chronic low and lower extremity pain. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which compared the effect of local anesthetic with or without steroids. The outcomes included pain relief, functional improvement, opioid intake, and therapeutic procedural characteristics. Pooled estimates were calculated using a random-effects or fixed-effects model, depending on the heterogeneity between the included studies. RESULTS: 10 RCTs (involving 1111 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that 41.7% of patients who received local anesthetic with steroid (group 1) and 40.2% of patients who received local anesthetic alone (group 2) had significant improvement in pain relief. And the Numeric Rating Scale pain scales were significantly reduced by 4.09 scores (95% CI: -4.26, -3.91), and 4.12 (95% CI: -4.35, -3.89) scores, respectively. Similarly, 39.8% of patients in group 1 and 40.7% of patients in group 2 achieved significantly improved functional status. The Oswestry Disability Index in the two groups were reduced by 14.5 (95% CI: -15.24, -13.75) and 12.37 (95% CI: -16.13, -8.62), respectively. The average procedures per year in group 1 was 3.68 ± 1.17 and 3.68 ± 1.26 in group 2 with an average total relief per year of 31.67 ± 13.17 weeks and 32.64 ± 13.92 weeks, respectively. The opioid intake decreased from baseline by 8.81 mg (95% CI: -12.24, -5.38) and 16.92 mg (95% CI: -22.71, -11.12) in the two groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis confirms that epidural injections of local anesthetic with or without steroids have beneficial but similar effects in the treatment of patients with chronic low back and lower extremity pain.